|

| |
September 5, 2005: Forced Marriage - A Criminal Offence?
A public consultation on whether to create a specific criminal
offence relating to forced marriage was launched today by
Home Office Minister
Baroness Scotland and Foreign and Commonwealth Minister Lord Triesman, as
part of a range of Government measures to tackle forced marriage. A forced
marriage is defined as one where one or both parties are coerced into a marriage
against their will and under duress. Duress includes both physical and emotional
pressure.
Currently, there is no specific criminal offence relating to
forced marriage within the UK. The introduction of a new criminal offence was
first proposed by Anne Cryer MP during the passage of the
Domestic Violence
Crime and Victims Act 2004.
The consultation sets out both the potential advantages and disadvantages of a
new criminal offence as well as a number of options for how a new offence might
be framed and enforced. The consultation period begins on 5 September 2005 and
will end on 5 December 2005, with a summary of responses due to be published by
5 February 2006, and a decision on next steps taken soon afterwards. The
consultation document
The Forced
Marriage - A Wrong not a Right is available online.
Baroness Scotland said:
“Forced marriage - as distinct from arranged marriage - is
marriage without freely given consent. It is an abuse of human rights and a
form of domestic violence which cannot be justified on religious or cultural
grounds. Victims come from a wide variety of backgrounds, can be men or women
and their marriages may take place both here in the UK or abroad... We
recognise that this is an issue with no clear or easy answers. We value the
insight and experience of all our partners, and of the individuals who have
first-hand experience of forced marriages. We hope that many people will
respond to this consultation document and help us to find the right way
forward."
Lord Triesman said:
"Today's launch of the consultation sets out both the
potential advantages and disadvantages of a new criminal offence as well as a
number of options for how a new offence might be framed. We want to learn from
the experience and insight of our partners and the individuals and communities
affected, and to benefit from their understanding, before making any decisions
about the introduction of a new criminal offence.
"The Forced Marriage Unit, the Government’s central unit dealing with forced
marriage casework, policy and projects, continues to provide information and
assistance both to potential victims and to concerned professionals who are
confronted by this abuse."
Arguments in favour of creating a new offence include:
- The introduction of a new offence could challenge people’s
views about forced marriage. This could in turn lead to fewer cases of forced
marriage.
- A new offence could have a strong deterrent effect.
People might not force others into marriage for fear of being prosecuted.
- The introduction of a new offence could empower young
people with more tools to negotiate with their parents.
- There may be some police officers, teachers and others who
don’t know that forced marriage is wrong and that they have the power to
tackle it. A new offence could simplify and clarify matters for public sector
employees and give them the confidence to tackle it.
Arguments against creating a specific offence include:
- There is a risk that the fear of their families being
prosecuted may stop victims from asking for help. Many victims who ask for
help at the moment ask for confirmation that their families will not get into
trouble.
- Some people think that there are already sufficient
criminal offences and protective measures that can be used.
- Because of the difficulty in collecting evidence and the
reluctance of many victims to testify against family members it may be
difficult to bring a successful prosecution. This could devalue a new offence.
- A new offence could disproportionately impact on Black and
Minority Ethnic communities and might be misinterpreted as an attack on those
communities.
- Increased risks of prosecution or threat of prosecution
would make it harder for victims to reconcile with their families.
- Increased involvement in criminal prosecutions could be
harrowing for victims who wanted to move on.
- Some people believe there are other better non-legislative
means of working within communities to change views and tackle the abuse.
No decision will be reached by the Government as to whether to
proceed subsequently with the introduction of a new criminal offence until the
consultation period is complete. The Government will publish a summary of the
responses to the consultation document within three months of the consultation
closing, and will also fund focus groups to examine the issues raised by the
consultation.
The Government has also produced guidelines for Police, Social Workers and
Education Professionals on dealing with cases of forced marriage.
Return to Top
| |
News Archives Index
Latest News
November 28, 2008: Call To End Orange Clothes For Community Payback
November 25, 2008: Legislation Protects Victims Of
Forced Marriage
November 24, 2008: Tasers For Police
November 11, 2008: Independent Review Alleges
Prison Service Incompetence
October 17, 2008: Sanctions For Reckless Traders, Says Napo
October 15, 2008: Jobs Axed in Probation, Prisons,
And Courts
October 3, 2008: IPCC On Double Fatal Shooting
October 2, 2008: Met Commissioner Sir Ian Blair
Resigns
October 1, 2008: New Met Police e-crime Unit
September 25, 2008: ID Cards Update
September 22, 2008: New Prostitution Rules
Supporting Trafficked Women
September 19, 2008: Mandatory Polygraph Tests for
Sex Offenders
September 12, 2008: Prison Transfer With Vietnam
Agreed
September 4, 2008: Reoffending Rates: New Figures
September 1, 2008: Tougher Community Work For
Offenders
August 26, 2008. Summary Justice Widening Criminal
Justice Net
August 21, 2008: Tightening Controls For Sex
Offenders
July 15, 2008: Explaining The Rise In Prison
Numbers
|