|
|
|
News Archive: Women & Criminal Justice (2004/5) March 23, 2005: Addressing Women’s Offending February 3, 2005: Supporting Survivors of Sexual Violence September 6, 2004: Thousands of Women Needlessly Imprisoned July 2, 2004: Choosing Judges: An Opaque, Biased and Outdated System? April 1, 2004:Women Receive Rough Justice From ‘Man-Made’ System March 23, 2005:
Addressing Women’s Offending February 3, 2005: Supporting Survivors of Sexual Violence A new legal handbook for victims of sexual violence has just been launched. ‘From Report to Court – A Handbook for Adult Survivors of Sexual Violence’ offers a comprehensive source of help and advice to victims from the perspective of the victim... more September 6, 2004: Thousands of Women Needlessly Imprisoned Six out of ten women imprisoned while
awaiting trial are subsequently acquitted or given a non-custodial sentence
according to a Prison
Reform Trust report by Dr Kimmett Edgar. The report states that the number
of women being remanded into custody has more than trebled in a decade, despite
the fact that more than three quarters are charged with non-violent or minor
offences.
The report highlights the fact that once in prison women receive inadequate support. They do not get the drug treatment or mental health care they require, are confined to their cells for long hours and have limited opportunities to stay in touch with family. The provision of bail information has broken down in many prisons. It concludes that custodial remand is used too frequently by the courts due to unacceptable failures to gather, present and transfer information about the needs and experiences of vulnerable women. There are also breakdowns in bail support in the community, a scarcity of court liaison and diversion schemes and gaps in healthcare and housing provision geared to the needs of women. The report recommends:
Prison Reform Trust Director Juliet Lyon,
stated: July 2, 2004: Choosing Judges: An Opaque, Biased and Outdated System? An independent report which is highly critical of the appointments process for the senior judiciary has just been published. The Commission for Judicial Appointments has examined every stage of the judicial appointments process in 2003. While the report argues that the “senior judiciary in England and Wales has an unrivalled reputation for integrity and intellectual ability”, it nevertheless acknowledges that “members of the High Court bench are predominantly white, male and drawn from a narrow social and educational background”. Given that a Black or Asian high court judge has yet to be appointed in either England or Wales, it is hardly surprising that the report argues that the mechanism by which judges are selected is considered to be "opaque, outdated and not demonstrably based upon merit". In the current system, candidates for the judiciary may either formally apply for appointment or be nominated (without their knowledge). Out of a total of 175 judicial candidates in 2003, 92 applied, while 83 were nominated. There were only 25 female candidates. Five out of the total of nine candidates offered high court posts were nominees, while no less than three were nominated by the lord chancellor. The report argues that in future all vacancies should be advertised and all candidates should apply. It recommends that an independent human resources expert should advise on drawing up a new selection process, which should require applications and consideration of candidates' abilities against specific criteria/competencies. There should be self-assessment, references, appraisals, interviews and possibly testing to establish their suitability. The report looks forward to a new process “with a job and person specification”. Short-listed candidates should be invited for interview by an appointments panel, comprising a combination of judicial and high level human resources expertise, and lay members. The impact of these recommendations remains to be seen. April 1, 2004:Women Receive Rough Justice From ‘Man-Made’ System The Fawcett Society’s
Commission on Women and the Criminal Justice System has launched its report,
which finds that women victims, offenders and workers receive rough justice from
a ‘man-made’ system. Women are failed by a criminal justice system designed
principally by men, and remains principally for men.
The Commission highlighted the continuing lottery of services
facing rape victims. It calls for a Sexual Assault Referral Centre to be
established in every police area and for specialist police officers to be made
available to all victims of rape.
Many Commissioners questioned whether women posing no serious
threat to others should be imprisoned at all. The Commission calls for an urgent
review of the alternatives to prison that could be used for women offenders.
Commissioners also heard evidence of sexual harassment and
discrimination experienced by women working in the system.Commissioners find
that the single most effective way of redressing the poor experiences of women
in the system would be to introduce a law which obliges public bodies to promote
sex equality.
The importance of the report was underlined by Solicitor General Harriet Harman QC MP, who commented that:
|
March 10, 2010: Rehabilitating Offenders On Short Prison Sentences March 3, 2010: New Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme March 3, 2010: New Prisons Chief Inspector February 24, 2010: New Prison Report February 24, 2010: Increasing Diversity In The Judiciary February 3, 2010: Deaths In Custody Website February 2, 2010: Carlile Report On Terrorism Laws February 1, 2010: JCA Commissioners Reappointed January 27, 2010: National Victims' Service January 22, 2010: Probation's Future Debated In Lords January 18, 2010: NAPO Call To Abolish NOMS January 14, 2010: Justice Committee Report Welcomed January 1, 2010: Deaths In Prison Custody December 23, 2009: 'Legal Highs' Banned November 20, 2009: Justice Secretary's Probation Visit November 18, 2009: Queen's Speech: On Crime November 16, 2009: Prisons: Public Or Private? |
|
Send mail to
CrimLinks
with questions or comments about this web site.
|